Elizabeth Holmes’ Lifestyle Of The Rich And Famous. Judge Says Details Of Her Extravagant Life Fair Game In Trial.

FILE - In this Monday, Nov. 2, 2015 file photo, Elizabeth Holmes, founder and CEO of Theranos, speaks at the Fortune Global Forum in San Francisco. Elizabeth Holmes, who ran Theranos until its 2018 collapse, hasn't paid her Palo Alto, California, attorney John Dwyer and his colleagues for the past year, according to documents filed Monday, Sept. 30, 2019 in Phoenix federal court. (AP Photo/Jeff Chiu, File)

It’s not the kind of notoriety she’s interested in sharing – at least with a judge and jury – but that’s what is going to happen in the trial of Theranos Inc. founder and self-made billionaire Elizabeth Holmes.

Holmes’ penchant for enjoying the finer things in life is fair game, according to a judge’s ruling on Saturday, with certain limitations.

Theranos was shuttered following a Wall Street Journal investigation that exposed unproven technology and questionable business practices at her blood-testing startup once valued at $9 billion.

U.S. District Judge Edward Davila said in the ruling late Saturday he’ll allow prosecutors to use Holmes’ luxurious lifestyle.

“This includes salary, travel, celebrity, and other perks and benefits commensurate with the position,” Davila wrote. “Each time Holmes made an extravagant purchase, it is reasonable to infer that she knew her fraudulent activity allowed her to pay for those items.” 

The limitations include seeking to eliminate improper “appeals to class prejudice,” Davila wrote.

Amy Saharia, a lawyer for Holmes, said in a CNBC story the trial in San Jose, Calif., is “going to be a sprawling mess of irrelevant, prejudicial evidence.”

Prosecutors said in a court filing: “The evidence at trial will show that these benefits were meaningful to the defendant, who closely monitored daily news to cultivate her image.” 

A key part of the prosecution’s case is Holmes’ lavish living, which, along with her relationships with power people, could be used to illustrate her reasons to commit fraud.

”People should not be punished merely for being wealthy, just as they should not be punished merely for being poor, but if someone profited from a crime, then the fruits of their crime is fair game to show their guilt and motive,” Barbara McQuade, a former U.S. Attorney who teaches at the University of Michigan law school, told Bloomberg.

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please hover over that comment, click the ∨ icon, and mark it as spam. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.